TV Just the TV commercial exploits, the mind atrophies and distorts the information.
Why are political and cultural programs (the vast majority of the time) sent over smaller networks in the sense of share (or as La7 Raitre)? Not to mention leaders Rai, while knowing well that the potential of plays that could make some programs (you can see Fazio-Saviano) are opposed to their implementation (for their content; obvious even write it) by going against their own company and against those who pay the fee, and I could go with those who deviate speeches by a problem of the salary implementation of these programs.
Rai Director: "I pay the fee, I expect a service worthy of what you spend I want a "Annozero" even more critical, I want a "Ballarò free, and not enough for me. I'm hungry for what we do open our eyes to the political class, whose government is building more of a stronghold, from which one looks out only when the air is perfumed with elections. "
Big Brother, in my opinion, could fit up to five years ago, when the economic crisis had not reached the apex
Beware of politicians: the people are alert and critical when there is no bread.
or I, and many other simple citizens, we could never be investigated for them or the like, as honest people. Well, then you can say that the more you have a role high power, the more likely the respondent is in adverse situations for yourself and for the professional who plays, perhaps because the benefit to smear political opponents, or perhaps because the gowns are really red. We must not forget however, that there are many politicians who play leading roles, but were never convicted, defendants can. What example is from those that grow and are based on the positions that were once represented by characters who have helped to change history? 
